I’m not saying a mother should put her child 2nd to any guy.What I’m saying is when there is a committed healthy (non abusive) relationship, your mate is important too.If the guy is reluctant or seems “too eager” to meet the kids (like on the first date), that should be a red flag.If you are divorced I can tell you why and if you can’t find any man I can tell you why. Does this mean that your children’s’ spouses will be evil if they prefer their children over you? And, interestingly, marriages that begin online are less likely to result in separation or divorce, and those that remained married are happier than their offline counterparts. begin online, according to a 2013 study released by the National Academy of Sciences.
) there are HUGE issues there and the person reading it should run for dear life. So there was no need for you to “counter” with “why I would put my child over a man” because he wasn’t arguing that point - you veered off into a completely different direction with your rant.The humor is used to distract.” Marital status: “separated”: This one isn’t necessarily a deal breaker.But Dan Neuharth, licensed marriage and family therapist, says “you need to find out just how separated he is.You’re definitely projecting…which kinda proves MIKW’s point… Matter of fact, the only time it wouldn’t be a red flag is if it was said by some misguided man who thought women would be super duper impressed he wrote it so he could show everyone just how much he loves his kids—which is, again something we hope would be the case, lol.Of course it goes without saying that kids come first. Actually, a man trying to impress women with something that should come naturally is a whole ‘nother kinda red flag… What he was referring to was when someone goes OUT OF THEIR WAY to put that phrase, ‘my kids come first’, in a profile or write it during a conversation (how does that even come up in conversation???Find a woman who is sterile, done with her childbearing, or doesn’t want kids.